Documentation

LLM Answer Match Evaluator

The LLM Answer Match Evaluator is a specialized component that compares generated responses against expected outputs to determine their semantic similarity and correctness. It helps ensure that generated answers align with expected responses while accounting for variations in expression.

LLM Answer Match Evaluator Component

LLM Answer Match Evaluator interface and configuration

Usage Note: The evaluator focuses on semantic matching rather than exact text matching. It can handle variations in wording while still identifying matching content and meaning.

Component Inputs

  • Input Text: The original query or context

    Example: "What is the capital of France?"

  • Generated Output: The answer to evaluate

    Example: "The capital city of France is Paris"

  • Expected Output: The expected answer

    Example: "Paris is France's capital"

  • LLM Model: The language model to use for evaluation

    Example: "gpt-4", "claude-2"

Component Outputs

  • Match Score: Similarity score between generated and expected output

    Example: 0.95 (95% match)

  • Match Details: Specific aspects of matching and differences

    Detailed breakdown of matching elements

  • Suggestions: Potential improvements for better matching

    Recommendations for improving match accuracy

How It Works

The LLM Answer Match Evaluator uses advanced semantic comparison techniques to evaluate the similarity between generated and expected responses, considering various aspects such as content, context, and meaning.

Evaluation Process

  1. Semantic parsing of inputs
  2. Content comparison
  3. Context analysis
  4. Similarity scoring
  5. Match detail generation
  6. Suggestion compilation

Use Cases

  • Answer Validation: Verify response accuracy
  • Quality Assurance: Ensure response quality
  • Training Data Validation: Verify training examples
  • Response Improvement: Identify areas for enhancement
  • Automated Testing: Test response accuracy at scale

Implementation Example

const answerMatchEvaluator = new LLMAnswerMatchEvaluator({ inputText: "What is the capital of France?", generatedOutput: "The capital city of France is Paris", expectedOutput: "Paris is France's capital", llmModel: "gpt-4" }); const result = await answerMatchEvaluator.evaluate(); // Output: // { // matchScore: 0.95, // matchDetails: { // contentMatch: true, // contextMatch: true, // variations: ["word order", "phrasing"] // }, // suggestions: ["Response is semantically equivalent"] // }

Best Practices

  • Provide clear expected outputs
  • Consider semantic variations
  • Use appropriate matching thresholds
  • Include relevant context
  • Review match details thoroughly